bearwithme wrote:
who was responsible for bringing this to the attention of the BOT in the first place?
I'm putting my money on one, some, or all of the following:
Diane Newton - right hand (wo)man of Meadors. Common sense tells me she would have informed Meadors of the "deal".
Meadors - would/should inform UCA law team about proposal to get their legal opinion. No doubt he informed Rousell of proposal for presentation to BoT. Common sense tells me this is where the "keep it under the covers" occurred. Bottom line, this is a case of deception, incompetence, or both.
Whoever the guilty party/parties are, imo they should be terminated for their deliberate misguidings. If their misguidings weren't deliberate then their incompetence is beyond reproach.
How long do we keep on giving out mulligans to the people who are chosen to lead this university? There is no defense or reasonable explanation acceptable for this kind of behavior. We've been there, done that but undoubtably didn't learn our lesson.
If I'm not mistaken the BoT promised the UCA nation, more or less, that this kind of thing would not happen again. It has, so therefore, if no action is taken by the removal of the individual/individuals responsible for this embarrassment then I have lost all confidence in the sincerity of the Board's promise to us. A lot of UCA faithful lost confidence after the Hardin scandal. Now is not the time to add fuel to the fire. It's time to step up or stand down.
And FOOT, Miss Shelton is not the problem here, she is just the messenger. I don't think we need to be concerned with what goes on at UA. We have our own hot pan of which we seem to keep jumping out of into the fire. I'm tired of getting our tails roasted. When does it stop?