Check out these two statements:
Quote:
Sabin, asked earlier about the debt, said, “We do desire to pay that debt back, and we’re not looking to escape from it. What UCA is doing is allowing us the opportunity to find ways to pay it back, and that’s what we’ve been working on.”
So this insinuates to me that UCA might not ever see that money again.
Quote:
The magazine owed the same amount in January.
That tells me that AO is not being charged interest for the "loan".
Until UCA collects its debt from a private business it loaned money to, I think I'll just start withholding my donations as a taxpayer. Undoubtably, UCA doesn't need my money as bad as advertised.