UpandIn913 wrote:
I'm guessing the NAIA schedule is not paying off...I'll guess we'll have to see
To me, this is one of the biggest misconceptions in college basketball. You really don't need 13 or 14 solid non-conference games to "get ready" for conference season.
It has a lot more to do with the opponent than the schedule.
I think the NAIA games pay off, especially when you're meshing a new team together, because it allows you to taste some success and you're not just down and out from the very beginning. If you come out and lose your first seven games, it's a lot easier for people to start mailing it in than it is to pull it together and suddenly start pulling wins out.
A baby's gotta eat, but that doesn't mean you feed it a steak to get it ready for the rest of its life.
You get 13-14 non-conference games, and if four are against NAIA cupcakes that leaves you with 9-10 games against Division I opponents. If you don't figure out what you need to in that many games, you're probably not going to get it anyway. I'd gladly take the tradeoff of getting four wins, feeling good about yourself and all that.
And, those games allow you to work full speed on some different sets and mix different lineups and all that. And getting different sets of people on the floor together and having some fun builds chemistry, which over the course of the season is probably more important than a couple more tough games.
They're basically your preseason games, just played in the regular season. If you've been playing basketball your whole life (and between high school and AAU, freshmen come in a lot more seasoned than they did 20-25 years ago), you're not going to learn just a whole ton in 13 games that you won't in 9.
It's incredible to me that this even comes up after one conference game. Here's a question nobody has raised ...
Is a Texas A&M-Corpus Christi team with 11 juniors and seniors, a couple of preseason all-conference players, six players 6-foot or taller and playing on its home floor
just a better team than the Sugar Bears?
Is that dumb to give credit to the opponent instead of looking for somewhere to place blame? Sometimes teams are just flat-out better. And Corpus is flat-out better.
Do Air Force, Alabama, Colorado State and Houston need to schedule tougher? Corpus has beaten all of them this year, too.
The Sugar Bears could have played UConn 13 times and it wouldn't have equaled a win over Corpus. I don't think playing Southern, UT-Martin, UAPB and Louisiana-Lafayette really makes you 22 points better than playing Ecclesia, Central Methodist, Wiley and Texas College.
Sometimes, other teams are just going to be more talented. That was the case yesterday. The plan is for that to be the case less and less each season.