Honey Bear wrote:
Rather odd that Chappell hasn't signed any high schoolers, according to the article. Not sure the quick fix approach will work. But hey, with our program steadily going downhill I guess he figures any approach is a better approach.
Over an extended period, I don't think you can really rely on re-stocking all the time on two-year transfers and have great success. But when you're not having much success as it is, I don't think it's a bad idea to go out and load up on what you feel/hope is instant help across the board. At least he's going exclusively JUCO guys and making a hard push for instant turnaround.
If nothing else, by doing that then you can (theoretically, of course) get yourself better over the next year or two as you come out from under the cloud of the postseason restriction, and then hopefully you find yourself tournament-eligible and a little more successful – all of which sets you up to be a more attractive option to better quality high school guys.
There's no point in taking freshmen for the sake of having freshmen if they can't play. Look at the list posted above ... not a whole lot of difference-makers in that group.
Of the 20 (well, 17 since three redshirted this year), only two – Pillow and Rueter – have made a significant impact. Too early to really say anything about the full body of work on Clayborn and Henson, but they obviously didn't do much this season.
So basically that's two of 15 so far (13 percent!) that have panned out.
I'd probably give transfers a shot, too.