UCAMonkey wrote:
Beary Manilow wrote:
when is the last time an SEC school hired a lower-division coach as its head football coach?
Kentucky - Hal Mumme/Valdosta State
So it's been 11 years, and that one didn't turn out real great – even with Tim Couch. I almost thought it was Nutt at Arkansas from Murray State, but then I remembered he had the brief stint at Boise.
BearBandMan wrote:
What top-tier FCS coach is going to want to leave a program to coach an FBS team they could probably already beat?
One who wanted to at least quintuple his income. Or one who wants to compete at the highest level in arguably the best conference in the country. Or one who wants to see what he can do with more resources at his disposal. Not necessarily more than his rivals, but just more than he has now.
BearBandMan wrote:
The only reasons I threw out CC are because 1.) They did look at our AD once I believe, so UCA has been on the radar before
AD and football coach are entirely different beasts. ADs don't need to be "sexy" hires, they just need to be good. The hiring of an AD doesn't happen in a pressure cooker like a football coaching search.
Think about it – how many Division I head coaches can you name? Even if it's not many, I would guarantee it's more than the amount of ADs you can name. By a lot.
With an AD, for the most part, the general public isn't going to have a strong emotional reaction one way or the other right away. That guy actually gets a chance to prove himself. A football coach has people tracking flights on the Internet if his name gets mentioned on a blog.
So comparing ADs to football coaches is apples to oranges. If oranges answered to apples.
Anyhow I'm in no way saying that Conque
shouldn't be considered for that job or a similar one, I just think given the way the system is set up these days, that he
won't be. I could always be proven wrong, though.